Drew Peterson attorneys seek Brodsky’s financial records - FOX 10 News | fox10phoenix.com

Drew Peterson attorneys seek Brodsky’s financial records

Posted: Updated:
CHICAGO (Sun-Times Media Wire) -

Drew Peterson's former attorney wants to keep his former colleagues from seeing his financial records, and is fighting a subpoena for those records in Will County court.

Peterson's current attorneys want the records to help prove their point that Joel Brodsky was motivated in part by personal financial gain when he represented Peterson.

They filed a subpoena seeking the records in preparation for a hearing on their motion for a new trial Feb. 19.

As part of the motion, they claim Brodsky ruined Peterson's chances of acquittal, not the least of which was orchestrating and sensationalizing the media coverage of the case.

Brodsky "paraded Drew across the airwaves as if Drew were a sideshow, suggesting carnival-like pranks to heighten public recognition of himself and his client, as exemplified by the ‘Win a Date With Drew' and a Bunny Ranch Reality Show," according to one filing in the case.

In December 2007, Brodsky and Peterson struck a deal with a publicist to get the duo photo ops and television appearances, magazine spreads and even product endorsements, including commercials.

The men also wanted the publicist to get them book and film deals, the attorneys say.

Releasing the financial records from his client account for Peterson would not violate attorney-client privilege, said Peterson attorney Steve Greenberg.

Brodsky attempted to file a statement in response to the subpoena Thursday, which was promptly sent back to him by Judge Edward Burmila.

"Attorney Brodsky is not to file any documents in this matter without leave of this court," Burmila's order said, adding that Brodsky has withdrawn from the case. "The proper response to a subpoena is to file a motion to quash the subpoena."

Brodsky filed the motion to quash the subpoena Friday morning after getting the judge‘s permission, Burmila said.

Burmila set Feb. 19 and 20 as the dates for Peterson's hearing on his motion for a new trial. If Burmila denies the motion, Peterson's sentencing hearing will begin immediately.

Peterson was convicted in September after a 24-day trial in the murder of his third wife, Kathleen Savio.

In December, Peterson attorney David Peilet filed a memo in Will County Circuit Court supporting the defense team's claims that former lead attorney Brodsky had a conflict of interest and ineffectively assisted Peterson during his trial.

Brodsky has denied those claims.

The motion from Peterson's lawyers claimed, among other things, a number of errors on Brodsky's part during the trial.

During the hearing for a new trial, Greenberg and fellow Peterson attorney Joseph "Shark" Lopez may have to take the stand, as well as Brodsky.

After a brief court appearance Friday, Peilet headed over to the jail to meet with Peterson and have him sign a letter authorizing Brodsky to release the financials.

Peilet said they are giving Brodsky a week to hand over the documents, and that he's hopeful Brodsky will drop his motion to quash the subpoena. If not, Burmila said he would hold a hearing on Brodsky's motion sometime before Feb. 19.

Share Your Photos & Video

Powered by WorldNow

511 W. Adams St.
Phoenix, AZ 85003

Phone: (602) 257-1234
Fax: (602) 262-0177

Didn't find what you were looking for?
All content © Copyright 2000 - 2014 Fox Television Stations, Inc. and Worldnow. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | New Terms of Service What's new | Ad Choices